While low-dose coronary artery calcium scoring scans (CAC) using CT have been around for some time, their effectiveness and relatively low cost in assessing cardiac risk seems to be taking on a new life. Accumulated wisdom and several newer studies have added to the body of clinical knowledge about CAC. These newer studies have done much to further validate its effectiveness in assessing cardiac risk in certain population groups. Because of this, CAC is being increasingly adopted by the medical community and many hospitals as an excellent screening tool to identify potential patients at moderate to higher risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). This blog will highlight these new findings and conclusions with links to the published studies. We also present a case study of a CFA client hospital that has effectively adopted CAC as a means to build public awareness along with offering a low-cost opportunity for the local and regional public to access a well-coordinated cardiac screening program.
Here is a summary of some salient conclusions from past and more recent studies about CAC.
A quick, non-scientific review of hospital websites by CFA shows that these types of programs are becoming increasingly common. The overall design of these programs, required screening components, and overall operation is straightforward and fairly easy to replicate by other facilities.
A Successful Regional Hospital Screening Program
CFA has been working with a regional hospital cardiac program to re-energize its program. The hospital has developed and implemented a very successful public awareness and cardiac screening program incorporating CT CAC and promoted through a comprehensive regional marketing program that uses radio and print media. From program inception in May 2018 until November 1, the program screened 724 patients along two tracks – a comprehensive cardiac screen protocol including a CAC scan and a CAC scan-only screening exam. The table below presents the actual number of patients screened in the 6-month period, their various levels of calcium scores and other vital statistics from the program. Note that the screening has resulted in a significant (and appropriate!) number of referrals for both physicians and the sponsoring hospital.
In this regional patient population, the percentage of patients needing further follow–up and/or study has been trending at 16-17% and those needing an intervention (PCI or CABG) at 3-4% respectively. A full screen for self-referring patients includes a risk evaluation, body composition/BMI, blood pressure evaluation, CT CAC scan, resting ECG, lipid panel, and hemoglobin A1C test, and is offered for $99. Physician referrals are accepted for CT heart scans only and is offered for $50. The CT scan is administered by Radiology and the non-cardiac portion of the scan read by radiologists. The CAC study is read by qualified hospital cardiologists. Critical to the success of any such program is widespread communication and endorsement among physicians and administration on the plans for the program and the role each participant is to fill. Basic to this premise is the support of the local and regional referring primary care physicians (PCPs) who will need to be educated on the efficacy and effectiveness of CAC. Communication and cooperation ensure that the maximum number of potential referrals are captured and that important feedback on both individual patient participation and overall program performance is enhanced.
As can be seen, CT calcium screening can be a highly effective screening tool at a very reasonable price. Virtually any hospital with the technical and clinical capability, involvement of trained and capable physicians and the will to succeed can develop a successful program that will enhance public awareness of coronary artery disease and the importance of early detection. One interesting finding emerging in some recent CAC studies is the ability of CAC to identify a sub-population of asymptomatic, low CHD risk individuals who have exceptionally high coronary calcium and, therefore, are at greater risk for serious coronary events. Please see the American Journal of Medicine article on this topic here.
If you are interested in learning more about cardiac screening programs, cardiac services strategic development, clinical service expansion and/or other programmatic needs for your cardiovascular program, please contact CFA at (949) 443-4005 or by e-mail at cfa@charlesfrancassociates.com.
[i] Matthew J. Budoff, et al., Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in the PROMISE Study (Prospective Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain), Circulation, Vol. 136, No. 21, 2018.
[ii] Silverman, MG, et al., Impact of Coronary Artery Calcium on Coronary Heart Disease Events in Individuals at the Extremes of Traditional Risk Factor Burden; The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. European Heart Journal, 2014 Sep 1;35 (33): 2232-41.
[iii] Grundy, Scott M., et al; AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASCP/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol, Circulation, 2018; DOI 10.1161.
[iv] Hecht, Harvey, et al. Clinical Indications for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Asymptomatic Patients: Expert Consensus Statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; J. of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, published online 24, January 2017, pgs. 157-158.
Continuing our discussion from Part Two of physician/hospital alignment issues in general, and the...